If you teach Sunday School, you will want to go view this "movie-map" that shows 5,000 years of history in the Middle East in about 90 seconds.
Very awesome...
Tuesday, October 31, 2006
Kerry reveals Liberal Character
The current controversy is John Kerry's recent statement where he basically said that people in the military are there because they are stupid. His exact quote is, "You know, education--if you make the most of it, you study hard, you do your homework, and you make an effort to be smart, uh, you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck in Iraq."
So, in the mind of John Kerry, the only reason some one will join the military is that they are not smart enough to do something else. Like many Americans, I find this comment deeply offensive. As the son of retired, career Air Force enlisted man, I have nothing but disdain for this man. How dare he talk about my Dad this way.
Kerry has no idea of personal sacrifice. No concept of honor. No belief in nobility. In his arrogance, he is projecting his values on others. He deduces that since he would only join the military if he were forced to (which he was), then he thinks that is the only reason anybody else would. Since we don't have a draft going on right now, there must be some external agent forcing people to join the military. That external agent, in his mind, is education. People must join the military only because they are not smart enough to do anything else.
This is the same mindset liberals always use. This reveals their character. Since they are self-centered individuals who will only do the "right" thing when forced to by others, they think everyone acts that way. Therefore, we need to use the power of government to force you to give to the needy. Therefore, we need to use the power of government to force you to be tolerant. Therefore, we need to use the power of government to force you to act as we think you should.
Well, Mr. Kerry, you are wrong. Some of us were raised to value others more than ourselves. Some of us were raised with values that hold high esteem for personal sacrifice, nobility, and honor. We do not need to be told what is right, nor do we need to be forced to behave in a fashion that is not self-seeking. We are humble and understand that there are concepts (such as Freedom, Liberty, Justice) that are more valuable than us and we are willing to freely choose to defend those values, despite the personal cost to us.
You want to know, Mr. Kerry, where I learned these values. From my FATHER, who expemplified these characteristics through his daily life. Who chose to provide for his family by serving in our great military. He knew the dangers. He was well aware of the risk. But he chose several times to re-enlist despite those risks because he valued something and someone more than himself. Mr. Kerry, while in the military my dad completed his college degree. Yes...he made personal sacrifices...worked every day, raised three children, and went to school. His values of hard work, determination, and self-reliance were passed down to his children. Mr. Kerry, my dad exemplifies the values that makes this country great. You could learn a lot from him.
So, in the mind of John Kerry, the only reason some one will join the military is that they are not smart enough to do something else. Like many Americans, I find this comment deeply offensive. As the son of retired, career Air Force enlisted man, I have nothing but disdain for this man. How dare he talk about my Dad this way.
Kerry has no idea of personal sacrifice. No concept of honor. No belief in nobility. In his arrogance, he is projecting his values on others. He deduces that since he would only join the military if he were forced to (which he was), then he thinks that is the only reason anybody else would. Since we don't have a draft going on right now, there must be some external agent forcing people to join the military. That external agent, in his mind, is education. People must join the military only because they are not smart enough to do anything else.
This is the same mindset liberals always use. This reveals their character. Since they are self-centered individuals who will only do the "right" thing when forced to by others, they think everyone acts that way. Therefore, we need to use the power of government to force you to give to the needy. Therefore, we need to use the power of government to force you to be tolerant. Therefore, we need to use the power of government to force you to act as we think you should.
Well, Mr. Kerry, you are wrong. Some of us were raised to value others more than ourselves. Some of us were raised with values that hold high esteem for personal sacrifice, nobility, and honor. We do not need to be told what is right, nor do we need to be forced to behave in a fashion that is not self-seeking. We are humble and understand that there are concepts (such as Freedom, Liberty, Justice) that are more valuable than us and we are willing to freely choose to defend those values, despite the personal cost to us.
You want to know, Mr. Kerry, where I learned these values. From my FATHER, who expemplified these characteristics through his daily life. Who chose to provide for his family by serving in our great military. He knew the dangers. He was well aware of the risk. But he chose several times to re-enlist despite those risks because he valued something and someone more than himself. Mr. Kerry, while in the military my dad completed his college degree. Yes...he made personal sacrifices...worked every day, raised three children, and went to school. His values of hard work, determination, and self-reliance were passed down to his children. Mr. Kerry, my dad exemplifies the values that makes this country great. You could learn a lot from him.
Monday, October 30, 2006
Only in the mind of a teen-ager
Teen agers are wierd breed; thier minds are just not wired correctly as this excerpt so clearly reveals:
United Press International - NewsTrack - MySpace losing its novelty:
So...in the mind of a teen...posting something online (a public forum) that is read by someone they didn't intend to read it is an "invasion of privacy." I just don't think I can get my head around that kind of logic.
United Press International - NewsTrack - MySpace losing its novelty:
"In past months, there have been security concerns involving MySpace. Some schools reported having teachers that were logging into their students' information, apparently to monitor for drug and alcohol abuse, but students were offended, saying it was an invasion of privacy."
So...in the mind of a teen...posting something online (a public forum) that is read by someone they didn't intend to read it is an "invasion of privacy." I just don't think I can get my head around that kind of logic.
Wednesday, October 25, 2006
Chilly School Won't Turn On Heat
WSBTV.com - News - Chilly School Won't Turn On Heat
Government Indoctrination Centers at their best. Gotta love it. Just remember, vouchers bad. No reason why a parent would want to choose to send their child to another educational institution, when they can have genius like this educating their children.
Government Indoctrination Centers at their best. Gotta love it. Just remember, vouchers bad. No reason why a parent would want to choose to send their child to another educational institution, when they can have genius like this educating their children.
Monday, October 23, 2006
Amish and Terror
My brother favorably linked to an article entitled, "What if the Amish were in charge of the War on Terror." I would recommend you go read the piece before continuing here.
Did you read it? No, really...go read it first...then come back here...I'll wait...
My brother called the article an "amazing and humbling read." While indeed I find the story of the Amish response to the terror brought into their community by a single, deranged man to be praiseworthy, exalted, and modeled, I think it would be foolish to compare that to the repeated acts of terrorism brought against our community for over 30 years by an entire community of deranged men who worship the Adversary. I know this makes me sound like some kind of hard-hearted, unforgiving, unmerciful, and un-Christian jerk, but let me make my case first before you blindly buy into the "feel-goodism" of Mrs. Bass' emotional, but thoughtless rhetoric.
I think there must be a distinction between personal relationships and global relationships. Christ taught us how we are to relate to one another on a personal level, but stayed away from being trapped into political arguments about how nations should relate to one another. Peacemaking and forgiveness is an individual responsibility that a Christian has to other individuals around him. I will entirely grant Mrs. Bass, my brother, and every other Christian that fact. What we see displayed in the actions of the Amish towards the Roberts family are the epitome of Christ's character in this very individualized manner. Indeed, it is beautiful. It is heart-warming. It is inspiring as to how Christians can create Heaven on Earth.
But the real question, then, is it "scalable?" Does God expect in global relationships, the same standards He does in individual relationships? I think we can firmly answer, "No." A few fundamental assumptions. God is unchanging. The God of the Old Testament is the God of the New Testament. While the death, burial and resurrection of Christ changed the covenant under which man relates to God, it did not change the nature of God. Therefore, we can look at how God used Israel to see expectations for relationships between nations.
When God spoke to the people of Israel at Mt. Sinai and gave them the 10 commandments, He commanded them not to kill or murder. However, that same God instructed those same people to kill in the name of war. I think we can easily see that to God the 10 Commandments are God's covenant with each individual Israeli and His subsequent instructions show He has a different standard for how a nation state is to relate to its world.
This is further evidenced in my second assumption. We are told in scripture that David was a man after God's own heart. A lot of times we take this passage and focus on the poetry and spirituality of David. However, David was also a warrior. He is led by God and relies upon God's sovereignty as he expanded the borders of Israel by pushing the Philistines from the land through the use of force. Now, I will agree that this did not come without a price. David was forbidden to build the temple because of his warrior-ways. But, he was doing what God wanted him to do when he killed those who would enslave and kill God's people.
I think it is also important to clarify that the USA is not a "Christian" nation, but a nation founded upon some Christian principles. At best this is a nation where the majority of people claim to be Christians (...but probably aren't really Christians in an active, participatory relationship with Christ...). To hold an entire nation/community that is NOT something to the standard of who you are is arrogant. It is easy for the Amish community, a closed-network of devout believers in a single interpretation of an ideology to a single standard. It would be very difficult to get a single interpretation of well-meaning Christians to agree on any ideology, let alone one that places the lives and security of the others at risk.
Finally, it is important to note that leaders have a duty to protect us. They don't have the luxury of living in fantasy world where we hope that people change. They will be held accountable for that responsibility. Let me put it this way. When I was in college and single, I had no problem picking up hitchhikers while traveling. Of course, this is a little dangerous, but I believed that as a Christian I had a social and spiritual obligation to assist those in need despite the dangers to myself. However, when I married and took over leadership of my family, my values changed a little. I no longer felt free to put my life on the line for a stranger because the detrimental effects on my family on the loss of my life. I put the welfare and safety of my wife and children ahead of the welfare of a stranger. My obligation to protect my family from danger OUTWEIGHS my social and spiritual responsibility to help a stranger. This is a stunning revelation, not all responsibilities of a Christian are equal. The same can be true with the War on Terrorism. While we would love to change the hearts and minds of the Muslim nation, our leaders have a moral obligation to protect us that OUTWEIGHS any perceived moral responsibility to change them.
The final issue that I have with Mrs. Bass' article is the assumption that there is a "root cause" (i.e., poverty) of terrorism other than evil. I know lots of poor people are not evil and are not out killing others for political and religious reasons. I've never been a big fan of the whole "root cause" of anything because "root cause" is typically used as justification for bad behavior. It gives people with no backbone a reason to not seek proper punishment. It is just a catch phrase of those who would excuse any action because discipline is hard work and may mean somebody might not like you. "Root Cause" speak allows people remove the responsibility of bad behavior from the person who committed the crime and place that responsibility on some third party. I am a firm believer that people should be held accountable for their own actions...i.e., people should reap what they sow.
Anyway, these are just a few little tidbits to chew on. I think reasonable people can disagree on an issue and an interpretation of scripture. Part of the Christian Community experience is the ability to throw out an idea and have more than just one person gnaw on some ideas. All of us grow and are sharpened as we exchange ideas, interpretations, assumptions, and thought processes. I've been writing this piece on and off for about a week now...so...feel free to tell me where I've gone wrong.
Did you read it? No, really...go read it first...then come back here...I'll wait...
My brother called the article an "amazing and humbling read." While indeed I find the story of the Amish response to the terror brought into their community by a single, deranged man to be praiseworthy, exalted, and modeled, I think it would be foolish to compare that to the repeated acts of terrorism brought against our community for over 30 years by an entire community of deranged men who worship the Adversary. I know this makes me sound like some kind of hard-hearted, unforgiving, unmerciful, and un-Christian jerk, but let me make my case first before you blindly buy into the "feel-goodism" of Mrs. Bass' emotional, but thoughtless rhetoric.
I think there must be a distinction between personal relationships and global relationships. Christ taught us how we are to relate to one another on a personal level, but stayed away from being trapped into political arguments about how nations should relate to one another. Peacemaking and forgiveness is an individual responsibility that a Christian has to other individuals around him. I will entirely grant Mrs. Bass, my brother, and every other Christian that fact. What we see displayed in the actions of the Amish towards the Roberts family are the epitome of Christ's character in this very individualized manner. Indeed, it is beautiful. It is heart-warming. It is inspiring as to how Christians can create Heaven on Earth.
But the real question, then, is it "scalable?" Does God expect in global relationships, the same standards He does in individual relationships? I think we can firmly answer, "No." A few fundamental assumptions. God is unchanging. The God of the Old Testament is the God of the New Testament. While the death, burial and resurrection of Christ changed the covenant under which man relates to God, it did not change the nature of God. Therefore, we can look at how God used Israel to see expectations for relationships between nations.
When God spoke to the people of Israel at Mt. Sinai and gave them the 10 commandments, He commanded them not to kill or murder. However, that same God instructed those same people to kill in the name of war. I think we can easily see that to God the 10 Commandments are God's covenant with each individual Israeli and His subsequent instructions show He has a different standard for how a nation state is to relate to its world.
This is further evidenced in my second assumption. We are told in scripture that David was a man after God's own heart. A lot of times we take this passage and focus on the poetry and spirituality of David. However, David was also a warrior. He is led by God and relies upon God's sovereignty as he expanded the borders of Israel by pushing the Philistines from the land through the use of force. Now, I will agree that this did not come without a price. David was forbidden to build the temple because of his warrior-ways. But, he was doing what God wanted him to do when he killed those who would enslave and kill God's people.
I think it is also important to clarify that the USA is not a "Christian" nation, but a nation founded upon some Christian principles. At best this is a nation where the majority of people claim to be Christians (...but probably aren't really Christians in an active, participatory relationship with Christ...). To hold an entire nation/community that is NOT something to the standard of who you are is arrogant. It is easy for the Amish community, a closed-network of devout believers in a single interpretation of an ideology to a single standard. It would be very difficult to get a single interpretation of well-meaning Christians to agree on any ideology, let alone one that places the lives and security of the others at risk.
Finally, it is important to note that leaders have a duty to protect us. They don't have the luxury of living in fantasy world where we hope that people change. They will be held accountable for that responsibility. Let me put it this way. When I was in college and single, I had no problem picking up hitchhikers while traveling. Of course, this is a little dangerous, but I believed that as a Christian I had a social and spiritual obligation to assist those in need despite the dangers to myself. However, when I married and took over leadership of my family, my values changed a little. I no longer felt free to put my life on the line for a stranger because the detrimental effects on my family on the loss of my life. I put the welfare and safety of my wife and children ahead of the welfare of a stranger. My obligation to protect my family from danger OUTWEIGHS my social and spiritual responsibility to help a stranger. This is a stunning revelation, not all responsibilities of a Christian are equal. The same can be true with the War on Terrorism. While we would love to change the hearts and minds of the Muslim nation, our leaders have a moral obligation to protect us that OUTWEIGHS any perceived moral responsibility to change them.
The final issue that I have with Mrs. Bass' article is the assumption that there is a "root cause" (i.e., poverty) of terrorism other than evil. I know lots of poor people are not evil and are not out killing others for political and religious reasons. I've never been a big fan of the whole "root cause" of anything because "root cause" is typically used as justification for bad behavior. It gives people with no backbone a reason to not seek proper punishment. It is just a catch phrase of those who would excuse any action because discipline is hard work and may mean somebody might not like you. "Root Cause" speak allows people remove the responsibility of bad behavior from the person who committed the crime and place that responsibility on some third party. I am a firm believer that people should be held accountable for their own actions...i.e., people should reap what they sow.
Anyway, these are just a few little tidbits to chew on. I think reasonable people can disagree on an issue and an interpretation of scripture. Part of the Christian Community experience is the ability to throw out an idea and have more than just one person gnaw on some ideas. All of us grow and are sharpened as we exchange ideas, interpretations, assumptions, and thought processes. I've been writing this piece on and off for about a week now...so...feel free to tell me where I've gone wrong.
Tuesday, October 17, 2006
Bumper Sticker
I saw the following bumper sticker on the way back from lunch today:
I literally laughed outloud.
Silly Liberal, Checks are for Workers
I literally laughed outloud.
Monday, October 16, 2006
FOX News - Breaking News >> U.S. Testing Confirms North Korea Nuke Test
I pondered last week as to whether the North Koreans had indeed performed a nuclear test AND if a "regular-Joe" could trust any official response from the government. As of that writing, Russia had confirmed that the test was indeed a nuclear test, the French had said it was not, and America had not released a confirmation nor denial.
It is just breaking news right now that America is confirming it was indeed a nuclear test. So, I think that we can trust the test was successful since both Russia and America are confirming the news. The French response last week, while saying it was not successful, was phrased in such a way to have wiggle room that it could have been successful. So, I am going to choose to trust the government that the N. Koreans did indeed successfully test a nuclear device.
It is just breaking news right now that America is confirming it was indeed a nuclear test. So, I think that we can trust the test was successful since both Russia and America are confirming the news. The French response last week, while saying it was not successful, was phrased in such a way to have wiggle room that it could have been successful. So, I am going to choose to trust the government that the N. Koreans did indeed successfully test a nuclear device.
Saturday, October 14, 2006
Peaceful
It is a perfect day outside, 72 degrees with perfect humidity. I am sitting on the back porch that I cleaned this morning monitoring a turkey I am smoking for a get together with friends this evening. The sweet smell of the Mesquite chips smoking creates the perfect ambiance. The children are snug in thier beds for afternoon naps, as is Momma. The only sounds are birds chirping from the neighbors pecan trees and the light twinkling of the wind chimes next door.
I have nothing pressing to do. No job that sits undone. No stress. It is just a quiet moment, for me, for nature, and wireless blogging. Right here, right now...I am at peace. Thank you God for these moments of You!
I have nothing pressing to do. No job that sits undone. No stress. It is just a quiet moment, for me, for nature, and wireless blogging. Right here, right now...I am at peace. Thank you God for these moments of You!
What Will Stop North Korea by Charles Krauthammer
Great opinion piece as Krauthammer compares the North Korean nuclear issue to the Cuban missle crisis and describes two types of deterrence that the US has issued to North Korea.
What Will Stop North Korea by Charles Krauthammer
He concludes with making a great case for why we should "step-up" our effort to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear technology.
What Will Stop North Korea by Charles Krauthammer
He concludes with making a great case for why we should "step-up" our effort to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear technology.
Political Stunt by Raj Bhakta
The former 'The Apprentice' star and now political candidate , Raj Bhakta demonstrated the total lack of border security by having elephants, led my a mariachi band, cross back and forth into the US.
The Brownsville Herald - Online Edition: "If I can get an elephant led by a mariachi band into this country, I think Osama bin Laden could get across with all the weapons of mass destruction he could get into this country," Bhakta said."I LOVE IT!!! Creative way to make a point. I loved Raj when he was on 'The Apprentice.' This is just the kind of stuff that communicates complex problems in clear, concise ways.
Friday, October 13, 2006
"NO WAY, DADDY"
Our sweet, precious little girl is a little over 2-1/2 years old. She is currently going through a "sassy"-stage where she feels that she has the right to talk back and be generally defiant towards her mother and me (she is an angel for everyone else). This is a big issue for us, because Erin and I expect respect from her. We also understand that dealing with this issue right now is vital for her long-term character development. If she will not honor her parents who she has seen, how can she honor God who she has not seen? We have tried various methods to stem this wave of disrespect including "penalty-spot", light-swats, taking toys away, etc... with very little long-term impact on the problem.
It is our belief that we have not found a consequence that scares her more than she loves the sin of dishonoring her father and mother. Once we devise a consequence that is harsh enough her behavior will change.
This same issue is being mirrored globally as the world wrestles with how to discipline North Korea for her defiance and disobedience. Just as Kim Jong Il assumed would happen when he set off his alleged nuclear explosion earlier this week, the consequences of his actions aren't amounting to much. The US has been forced to offer a compromised UN resolution that is devoid of any military sanctions. It only contains "punishments" like travel restrictions, economic restrictions, and the breaking of diplomatic relations. Mere "hand-slaps" and "penalty-spot" type consequences. The whole scenario reminds me of an old Monty Python sketch in which the police are trying to apprehend a criminal. The criminal, of course, shows comedic disregard of the police who are armed only with their nightsticks. The police then only have one course of action: to say "Stop! or I'll say stop again!" (I couldn't find a clip of it online).
This is because we can't convince China or Russia to sign on to any military action. Which makes some sense, at least from the Chinese perspective. If military action is part of the resolution, and the situation escalates to the needing of that action, whose troops will make up the lion's share of the UN force that removes Kim Jong Il from power? Why, the US's, of course. That means that the US will have troops in a country that borders China. China wants to keep the US out of North Korea so that we don't have a place to stage a land force against them. China could swat North Korea like a fly if it wanted to, but then it would have to occupy North Korea. They don't want to do that for the same reason...we have troops in South Korea and have a strategic location for staging a land force against China. Right now, North Korea acts as a buffer that keeps US and Chinese troops from being too close to one another.
I'll admit that I don't see or understand why Russia is against the idea of military action against North Korea. I don't know what their motivation is for protecting North Korea from a harsh consequence.
I do know, though, that since Erin and I have the same goals for our daughter, we will be able to teach her respect for us, respect for others, and, ultimately respect for God. I've seen families where the parents disagree over the goals for their children and those houses are chaotic places to be...you know...that whole "house divided against itself" thing.
The same principle hold true globally. If the "Super-powers" of the world are divided on this North Korea issue, then it will not matter what the US does and the world will be a place of chaos. North Korea will have permission to continue acting like a defiant 2-1/2 year old.
It is our belief that we have not found a consequence that scares her more than she loves the sin of dishonoring her father and mother. Once we devise a consequence that is harsh enough her behavior will change.
This same issue is being mirrored globally as the world wrestles with how to discipline North Korea for her defiance and disobedience. Just as Kim Jong Il assumed would happen when he set off his alleged nuclear explosion earlier this week, the consequences of his actions aren't amounting to much. The US has been forced to offer a compromised UN resolution that is devoid of any military sanctions. It only contains "punishments" like travel restrictions, economic restrictions, and the breaking of diplomatic relations. Mere "hand-slaps" and "penalty-spot" type consequences. The whole scenario reminds me of an old Monty Python sketch in which the police are trying to apprehend a criminal. The criminal, of course, shows comedic disregard of the police who are armed only with their nightsticks. The police then only have one course of action: to say "Stop! or I'll say stop again!" (I couldn't find a clip of it online).
This is because we can't convince China or Russia to sign on to any military action. Which makes some sense, at least from the Chinese perspective. If military action is part of the resolution, and the situation escalates to the needing of that action, whose troops will make up the lion's share of the UN force that removes Kim Jong Il from power? Why, the US's, of course. That means that the US will have troops in a country that borders China. China wants to keep the US out of North Korea so that we don't have a place to stage a land force against them. China could swat North Korea like a fly if it wanted to, but then it would have to occupy North Korea. They don't want to do that for the same reason...we have troops in South Korea and have a strategic location for staging a land force against China. Right now, North Korea acts as a buffer that keeps US and Chinese troops from being too close to one another.
I'll admit that I don't see or understand why Russia is against the idea of military action against North Korea. I don't know what their motivation is for protecting North Korea from a harsh consequence.
I do know, though, that since Erin and I have the same goals for our daughter, we will be able to teach her respect for us, respect for others, and, ultimately respect for God. I've seen families where the parents disagree over the goals for their children and those houses are chaotic places to be...you know...that whole "house divided against itself" thing.
The same principle hold true globally. If the "Super-powers" of the world are divided on this North Korea issue, then it will not matter what the US does and the world will be a place of chaos. North Korea will have permission to continue acting like a defiant 2-1/2 year old.
Thursday, October 12, 2006
Back on Synthroid
I went to the endocrinologist today and my blood work showed that, following the radioactive-iodine treatment for hyperactive-thyroidism, I had moved to hypoactive-thyroidism. I am back on Synthroid. I am so excited. I should be feeling so much better in a couple of weeks.
North Korea nuclear test failed...maybe?
On my last post, I made sure to make it clear that it "appears" that North Korea had successfully set off a nuclear warhead. Obviously, one can not believe any information released by the North Korean government.
I also, wondered, though, how I would know for sure if they had really accomplished the task. If the US agreed that North Korea had been successful, that is a pretty reliable report. However, if the US says that the test was not successful, can I truly believe them? If any of our allies also report the test was not successful, can we be sure that the heads of these states have not colluded to mis-report the results?
Well - now we have France reporting that the test was either a failure or non-nuclear explosion. Since France is not a friend of the US and works against us, I tend to use that information to think that probably the Heads of state are NOT colluding.
The big problem I still have, though, is Russia has confirmed that test was successful. How does a peon, a regular-Joe, really understand these results and get to the truth of the matter?
As of this writing, I can't find an official response from the US government validating or denying the North Korean claim.
I also, wondered, though, how I would know for sure if they had really accomplished the task. If the US agreed that North Korea had been successful, that is a pretty reliable report. However, if the US says that the test was not successful, can I truly believe them? If any of our allies also report the test was not successful, can we be sure that the heads of these states have not colluded to mis-report the results?
Well - now we have France reporting that the test was either a failure or non-nuclear explosion. Since France is not a friend of the US and works against us, I tend to use that information to think that probably the Heads of state are NOT colluding.
The big problem I still have, though, is Russia has confirmed that test was successful. How does a peon, a regular-Joe, really understand these results and get to the truth of the matter?
As of this writing, I can't find an official response from the US government validating or denying the North Korean claim.
Monday, October 09, 2006
Current Score: Axis of Evil: 3 US: 1
This weekend the Axis of Evil scored another point as North Korea appears to have successfully conducted its first nuclear bomb test. While this is bad news for the Bush administration, it is worse news for all us here regular folk. One of the "freezing" factors of the Cold War with the former Soviet Union was the fact that neither the US nor the Soviet Union really wanted to destroy the other one. We were locked into a stalemate that neither country had any real reason to break through the delivery of a nuclear weapon to the other one. It was far better to use the perceived threat of an enemy to maintain local power than it was to actually get involved in a nuclear show-down that would result in the total annihilation of both parties (resulting in no power).
This is the same kind of stalemate we see currently with Pakistan and India. Neither country trusts the other one to have the technology they don't have. But since both countries have the same technology, the countries' needs for self-preservation will prevent either one from using the technology on each other.
North Korea, though, is a different animal all together. This backward country has little use of logic. Kim Jong Il, like most egotistical, maniacal dictators, fancies himself as indestructible. He cares not about protecting his people and his adolescent view of his own immortality (i.e., "I can do whatever I want and not get hurt) has short-circuited the self-preservation, internal governor that prevents most leaders with nuclear weapons from using them. In other words, we are talking about a crazy dude who doesn't care that if he uses a nuclear weapon that he will be retaliated against with like force.
Of course, maybe he is far smarter than I am giving him credit for and he understands that he could indeed use a nuclear weapon with impunity knowing that if the US did retaliate with "like force," we would be painted as the bad guy in the world community. After all, under the new rules of 21st century warfare, the killing of innocents (especially women and children) by the US is completely verboten. In other words, if even one child would be accidently harmed in a military maneuver, then we must be forbidden from using that tactic. By holding ourselves to this exceptionally high standard of preventing all civilian casualties, we would be unable to use our own nuclear weapons against North Korea even if she uses them against us first. Obviously, that is a foolish position, but it is the realistic one.
We already know that North Korea has tried to get a long-range cruise missile to Hawaii and failed. If they do happen to succeed, we now know they can attach a nuclear warhead to that missile. Instead of the WTC attacks of 9/11 being our Pearl Harbor, we could actually see another Pearl Harbor.
The pundits are out in full force today talking "shoulda, woulda, coulda." However, an intelligent overview shows that we have only wasted our time and money in the past "bribing" North Korea not to build a weapon, only to have them defy their part of the agreement and continue working unabated on the product. The only thing we could have done that would have truly prevented this moment would have been to pre-emptively removed Kim Jong Il from power or to have used force to destroy his laboratories...neither of which we had the internal fortitude to do, especially after our "problems" in Iraq.
Which brings me to my title, the score. In his January 2002 State of the Union Address when President Bush named Iran, Iraq, and North Korea as the Axis of Evil, America applauded. We were willing to deal boldly and decisively with these countries in the aftermath of a humilitating attack on our own lands against our own civilians. Bush was able to use the legal authority of the UN resolutions from Desert Storm to invade Iraq and remove it from Axis of Evil and America scored the first point. Sure you can debate the finer points of the war such as did weapons of mass destruction exist or was faulty intelligence used. I've discussed it before and have seen no evidence to change my mind that indeed the best intelligence from the best sources was accurate. We have found weapons of mass destruction (just not nuclear...but those bio-weapons are still WoMD and just not "stockpiles"...whatever that word means...I guess being able to only kill 20,000 people instead of 200,000 people means its not a stockpile).
Now, Iran scored the first point for the Axis of Evil by using her influence to fight us in Iraq instead of in Iran. That is something most people do not understand. Our current "quagmire" in Iraq is more influenced by Iran than any other source. Iran wants us to cut and run so that they can move into Iraq and re-establish a Persian empire financed by the oil-fields of Iraq. Iran used Hezbollah to attack Israel and they are using Iraq to attack us.
Meanwhile, Iran has scored their second point by blantantly continuing its own research toward the development of a nuclear device. By using our own media and "world opinion" against us, Iran has effectively distracted us from acting against them. Basically because Iran is using their influence to produced a mess in Iraq they can boldly move forward acquiring the technology necessary to keep us from doing to Iran what we have done in Iraq.
Finally, North Korea scores a point for the Axis of Evil by acquiring nuclear weapons. What a miserable state of affairs for this great nation.
This puts us in a precarious situation. Because we care more about image than security, we have failed to take the hardline stances necessary to prevent this mess. Because we appease the appeasers we appease our enemies allowing them to grow stronger. Because we dare not polarize our already divided nation, we have now paralyzed ourselves from being able to deal with these situations.
This is the same kind of stalemate we see currently with Pakistan and India. Neither country trusts the other one to have the technology they don't have. But since both countries have the same technology, the countries' needs for self-preservation will prevent either one from using the technology on each other.
North Korea, though, is a different animal all together. This backward country has little use of logic. Kim Jong Il, like most egotistical, maniacal dictators, fancies himself as indestructible. He cares not about protecting his people and his adolescent view of his own immortality (i.e., "I can do whatever I want and not get hurt) has short-circuited the self-preservation, internal governor that prevents most leaders with nuclear weapons from using them. In other words, we are talking about a crazy dude who doesn't care that if he uses a nuclear weapon that he will be retaliated against with like force.
Of course, maybe he is far smarter than I am giving him credit for and he understands that he could indeed use a nuclear weapon with impunity knowing that if the US did retaliate with "like force," we would be painted as the bad guy in the world community. After all, under the new rules of 21st century warfare, the killing of innocents (especially women and children) by the US is completely verboten. In other words, if even one child would be accidently harmed in a military maneuver, then we must be forbidden from using that tactic. By holding ourselves to this exceptionally high standard of preventing all civilian casualties, we would be unable to use our own nuclear weapons against North Korea even if she uses them against us first. Obviously, that is a foolish position, but it is the realistic one.
We already know that North Korea has tried to get a long-range cruise missile to Hawaii and failed. If they do happen to succeed, we now know they can attach a nuclear warhead to that missile. Instead of the WTC attacks of 9/11 being our Pearl Harbor, we could actually see another Pearl Harbor.
The pundits are out in full force today talking "shoulda, woulda, coulda." However, an intelligent overview shows that we have only wasted our time and money in the past "bribing" North Korea not to build a weapon, only to have them defy their part of the agreement and continue working unabated on the product. The only thing we could have done that would have truly prevented this moment would have been to pre-emptively removed Kim Jong Il from power or to have used force to destroy his laboratories...neither of which we had the internal fortitude to do, especially after our "problems" in Iraq.
Which brings me to my title, the score. In his January 2002 State of the Union Address when President Bush named Iran, Iraq, and North Korea as the Axis of Evil, America applauded. We were willing to deal boldly and decisively with these countries in the aftermath of a humilitating attack on our own lands against our own civilians. Bush was able to use the legal authority of the UN resolutions from Desert Storm to invade Iraq and remove it from Axis of Evil and America scored the first point. Sure you can debate the finer points of the war such as did weapons of mass destruction exist or was faulty intelligence used. I've discussed it before and have seen no evidence to change my mind that indeed the best intelligence from the best sources was accurate. We have found weapons of mass destruction (just not nuclear...but those bio-weapons are still WoMD and just not "stockpiles"...whatever that word means...I guess being able to only kill 20,000 people instead of 200,000 people means its not a stockpile).
Now, Iran scored the first point for the Axis of Evil by using her influence to fight us in Iraq instead of in Iran. That is something most people do not understand. Our current "quagmire" in Iraq is more influenced by Iran than any other source. Iran wants us to cut and run so that they can move into Iraq and re-establish a Persian empire financed by the oil-fields of Iraq. Iran used Hezbollah to attack Israel and they are using Iraq to attack us.
Meanwhile, Iran has scored their second point by blantantly continuing its own research toward the development of a nuclear device. By using our own media and "world opinion" against us, Iran has effectively distracted us from acting against them. Basically because Iran is using their influence to produced a mess in Iraq they can boldly move forward acquiring the technology necessary to keep us from doing to Iran what we have done in Iraq.
Finally, North Korea scores a point for the Axis of Evil by acquiring nuclear weapons. What a miserable state of affairs for this great nation.
This puts us in a precarious situation. Because we care more about image than security, we have failed to take the hardline stances necessary to prevent this mess. Because we appease the appeasers we appease our enemies allowing them to grow stronger. Because we dare not polarize our already divided nation, we have now paralyzed ourselves from being able to deal with these situations.
Friday, October 06, 2006
Are you dead, Mon?
No. I have not passed over the horizon on my never-ending journey...I've just been walking through the desert on a horse with no name (that sounds vaguely familiar...)
Anyway, let me give you a few highlights so that you can catch you up with my life since I last posted over a month ago:
Sept. 1 - New Job
I started a new job on Sept. 1, working for ARELLO. Basically, this is one of the major reasons you haven't seen or heard from me the past month. I've been so busy getting the new project off the ground there that I have not had time to breathe. But, it went live from here on Sept. 29, so...I can relax a little bit.
Sept. 9 - Parenting Seminar at Church
Our church hosted John Rosemond for a parenting seminar. Being the "sound guy" at church it was my job to be there early on Saturday morning to do a sound check with the speaker. The seminar was scheduled to start at 9:00 AM so I arrived at 7:30 AM. Our preacher, Don, and I pulled into the parking lot at the same time and we walked into the lobby together to hear a "beep-beep-beep" sound that indicates a failure in the fire alert system. Don mentions he will have to go reset it and we walk to the auditorium. When I unlock the door and flip the light switch, nothing happens. There is no power. Since there is power in the lobby, we figure a fuse has blown and go to the back room where the fuseboxes are to reset them. Now, back in the back room, behind two locked doors, one of which is keyed with a special key that only Don and the maintenance man have, lies the fuse boxes. Also in that room is five-foot or so deep hole in the concrete that will serve as an elevator shaft. Well since there is not power, I am using my cell-phone as a flashlight...(I'm sure you see where this going...or better, where I am going). We mess with the fuse boxes and nothing happen. However, we are pretty sure that the fuseboxes for the auditorium are somewhere else...across the dark room I see a green light and think..."Oh, there be the fusebox" and march over and step right off the edge of the elevator shaft and land smack on my bum at the bottom of the hole. My first thought is, "DRAT, Don is right behind...I smell sermon illustration material."
Well...to make a long story somewhat short, I was OK. We discovered that one of the two legs of power that come into the building had failed. I quickly set up (rigged) a sound system in the lobby while other men pulled chairs out and we set up the seminar in the lobby. It was fun and exciting...at 8:45 I got everything to work and we had sound.
Sure enough, I made the sermon (listen to the entire sermon | excerpt of the illustration) the next day.
Sept. 16 - Apple Picking in Saint Louis
We traveled to St. Louis for the annual family apple picking trip. Mihaela was so excited. It was all she could talk about for two weeks before the trip. Going to Mam-maw and Pap-paws house to go apple picking. Going to ride the tractor. Going to see the farm. She loved every minute of it. She even surprised us by being adventurous. Mihaela tends to not be a risk-taker, but to be very cautious. However, on the Saturday of Apple Picking, she wanted to experience everything. She was proactive looking for things to try. She even asked to ride the horses and she loved it. She was such a big girl. A good time was had by all.
October 2 - Dr. Appt for Baby
Everything looking good there. Erin still getting sick (but not as bad) but being a trooper. She is worn-out, though, by the time I get home. Which is another reason posts have been non-existent. She just crashes (understandably so) when I get home and I jump in. Then, by the time the kids are fed, bathed, in bed and the house is reset for the next day's activities, I am just exhausted.
Other Funny\Cute\Asundry Stuff
Erin was sitting on the couch watching college football while I was in the kitchen doing dishes or something like that when she said, "Maybe I'm just old-fashioned, but I just don't think a woman should be a football sportscaster." Yeah dear. Old-fashioned, traditional values.
Mihaela woke up a few minutes ago she found her Dora princess doll and her Elmo doll she brought Elmo out after she found him and "introduced" Elmo to Dora!
"Hey, Elmo this is princess Dora"
"ooohhhh, Elmo give kisses to Dora"
"Elmo sit in Dora's lap"
"Elmo, remember me? I am 'Haela"
DO NOT USE OfficeCalendar because they, IMHO, have a bad business ethic.
I have a client who upgraded his Office Suite to MS Office 2003. Well, this client has three people working in the office and they were able to share their calendars, task lists, and contacts under the old version of Office. Well, MS, in its wisdom removed the ability to do this unless you are running an Exchange server, which is too much power for an office of three. We looked for other alternatives and found this package. It works well, but they hid their pricing scheme in their knowledge base...so we thought we would have to buy 3 licensee for them (one for each person using the product), but NO... you have to buy a licensee for each user AND each resource. They use 4 resources, which means we had to buy 7 licensees instead of 3. Of course, we didn't find out about needing the additional 4 until after we had purchased 3 (at $100\each). So, instead of finding a $300 solution, we found a $700 solution. We could only charge our client the $300 because that is what we quoted them. When we complained to the company, we were basically told to "brush off" that the pricing structure was on the website. Yeah, but you have to search the knowledge base to find it!!!
TTYL
Ok...that is enough rambling. I've got a post up...maybe I can be more faithful again. But I won't make any promises.
Anyway, let me give you a few highlights so that you can catch you up with my life since I last posted over a month ago:
Sept. 1 - New Job
I started a new job on Sept. 1, working for ARELLO. Basically, this is one of the major reasons you haven't seen or heard from me the past month. I've been so busy getting the new project off the ground there that I have not had time to breathe. But, it went live from here on Sept. 29, so...I can relax a little bit.
Sept. 9 - Parenting Seminar at Church
Our church hosted John Rosemond for a parenting seminar. Being the "sound guy" at church it was my job to be there early on Saturday morning to do a sound check with the speaker. The seminar was scheduled to start at 9:00 AM so I arrived at 7:30 AM. Our preacher, Don, and I pulled into the parking lot at the same time and we walked into the lobby together to hear a "beep-beep-beep" sound that indicates a failure in the fire alert system. Don mentions he will have to go reset it and we walk to the auditorium. When I unlock the door and flip the light switch, nothing happens. There is no power. Since there is power in the lobby, we figure a fuse has blown and go to the back room where the fuseboxes are to reset them. Now, back in the back room, behind two locked doors, one of which is keyed with a special key that only Don and the maintenance man have, lies the fuse boxes. Also in that room is five-foot or so deep hole in the concrete that will serve as an elevator shaft. Well since there is not power, I am using my cell-phone as a flashlight...(I'm sure you see where this going...or better, where I am going). We mess with the fuse boxes and nothing happen. However, we are pretty sure that the fuseboxes for the auditorium are somewhere else...across the dark room I see a green light and think..."Oh, there be the fusebox" and march over and step right off the edge of the elevator shaft and land smack on my bum at the bottom of the hole. My first thought is, "DRAT, Don is right behind...I smell sermon illustration material."
Well...to make a long story somewhat short, I was OK. We discovered that one of the two legs of power that come into the building had failed. I quickly set up (rigged) a sound system in the lobby while other men pulled chairs out and we set up the seminar in the lobby. It was fun and exciting...at 8:45 I got everything to work and we had sound.
Sure enough, I made the sermon (listen to the entire sermon | excerpt of the illustration) the next day.
Sept. 16 - Apple Picking in Saint Louis
We traveled to St. Louis for the annual family apple picking trip. Mihaela was so excited. It was all she could talk about for two weeks before the trip. Going to Mam-maw and Pap-paws house to go apple picking. Going to ride the tractor. Going to see the farm. She loved every minute of it. She even surprised us by being adventurous. Mihaela tends to not be a risk-taker, but to be very cautious. However, on the Saturday of Apple Picking, she wanted to experience everything. She was proactive looking for things to try. She even asked to ride the horses and she loved it. She was such a big girl. A good time was had by all.
October 2 - Dr. Appt for Baby
Everything looking good there. Erin still getting sick (but not as bad) but being a trooper. She is worn-out, though, by the time I get home. Which is another reason posts have been non-existent. She just crashes (understandably so) when I get home and I jump in. Then, by the time the kids are fed, bathed, in bed and the house is reset for the next day's activities, I am just exhausted.
Other Funny\Cute\Asundry Stuff
Erin was sitting on the couch watching college football while I was in the kitchen doing dishes or something like that when she said, "Maybe I'm just old-fashioned, but I just don't think a woman should be a football sportscaster." Yeah dear. Old-fashioned, traditional values.
Mihaela woke up a few minutes ago she found her Dora princess doll and her Elmo doll she brought Elmo out after she found him and "introduced" Elmo to Dora!
"Hey, Elmo this is princess Dora"
"ooohhhh, Elmo give kisses to Dora"
"Elmo sit in Dora's lap"
"Elmo, remember me? I am 'Haela"
DO NOT USE OfficeCalendar because they, IMHO, have a bad business ethic.
I have a client who upgraded his Office Suite to MS Office 2003. Well, this client has three people working in the office and they were able to share their calendars, task lists, and contacts under the old version of Office. Well, MS, in its wisdom removed the ability to do this unless you are running an Exchange server, which is too much power for an office of three. We looked for other alternatives and found this package. It works well, but they hid their pricing scheme in their knowledge base...so we thought we would have to buy 3 licensee for them (one for each person using the product), but NO... you have to buy a licensee for each user AND each resource. They use 4 resources, which means we had to buy 7 licensees instead of 3. Of course, we didn't find out about needing the additional 4 until after we had purchased 3 (at $100\each). So, instead of finding a $300 solution, we found a $700 solution. We could only charge our client the $300 because that is what we quoted them. When we complained to the company, we were basically told to "brush off" that the pricing structure was on the website. Yeah, but you have to search the knowledge base to find it!!!
TTYL
Ok...that is enough rambling. I've got a post up...maybe I can be more faithful again. But I won't make any promises.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)