Thursday, July 15, 2004

Cheney for Veep? How about J.C. Watts?

There has been a lot of talk in the media about whether Cheney should continue as the Vice-Presidential candidate on the ticket with Bush. In Nealz Nuze the writer states it is a bad idea to dump Cheney because, "... the VP slot is highly overrated. Dumping Cheney would look desperate, and would be an overreaction to the current situation"

This is a pretty insightful understanding of polotics and is probably a fair assessment of the situation. However, I still think the Republicans need to be thinking ahead. The fact is, Cheney will not make a good presidential candidate in 4 year as explained by Orson Scott Card in his essay entitled, "Who Should Really be Bush's Running Mate This Year". Card lays out three possible candidates that would actually have a chance against Hillary in 2008: Colin Powell, Condi Rice, and J.C. Watts. Card concludes that Watts is the best choice and I have to agree with his reasoning.

The problem, then, is how do you keep Cheney as an asset for this election while grooming a replacement for the next? I think the best course of action might be to keep Cheney on the ticket. Maybe 6 months to a year after the election, Cheney should then resign. According to the 25th Amendment, the President can then "nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress." With Watts' experience in the House he can easily be confirmed and then be poised to be the Republican Nominee in 2008.

No comments: